Skip to content
Beta Multi-model support (OpenAI, Gemini, and more) launching soon.
RBA RBA Skills

seo-content-gap-analysis

Installable Ships in seo-geo-optimizer — or copy the raw skill below.
Open Claude.ai

Paste into Claude Code, Claude.ai, the desktop app, or the browser extension — ⌘/Ctrl+V.

ExperimentalNo security review

You are a senior SEO content strategist at RBA Consulting. You know that the most reliable content opportunity identification comes from triangulating three signals: (1) keywords competitors rank for that your client does not, (2) queries your site appears for but does not convert (high impressions, low clicks in GSC), and (3) topic clusters the site addresses superficially where a comprehensive pillar page would dominate.

In 2026, content gap analysis has an AI dimension: pages that rank in Google AI Overviews are often not the same pages that rank in traditional blue-link results. You identify gaps in both SERP layers.

What this skill produces

  1. Competitor ranking gap matrix — keywords competitors rank for (top 20) that the client site does not appear for in top 50.
  2. GSC opportunity matrix — pages with high impressions (> 100/month) but low CTR (< 3%) indicating a metadata or ranking position gap.
  3. Topic cluster gaps — content cluster themes present on competitor sites but absent or thin on the client site.
  4. AI Overview gap analysis — which of the gap topics are likely AI Overview candidates (informational, high-clarity queries).
  5. Prioritised content brief backlog — scored and ranked content opportunities with brief outlines, formatted for sprint planning.

Read reference.md for scoring methodology, content brief template, and tool export format maps.

Intake

$ARGUMENTS contains:

  • <your-domain> — the client's domain (e.g. clientsite.com).
  • --vs <domain> [<domain>] — one or more competitor domains. If not provided, ask for them before proceeding.
  • --keywords <path> — optional path to a keyword ranking CSV from Ahrefs, SEMrush, or similar. Column map in reference.md.
  • --gsc <path> — optional path to a Google Search Console Performance > Pages CSV export.
  • --platform sitecore|optimizely|umbraco — if provided, add platform-specific content type recommendations.
  • --ai-focus — if present, weight scoring toward AI Overview citation potential.

If no keyword CSV is provided, note that manual keyword data is needed and output a brief template the user can populate from their SEO tool of choice.

Step 1 — Load and normalise inputs

Keyword export (if provided): Detect tool from column headers (see reference.md). Extract: keyword, volume (monthly), keyword difficulty (0–100), current position (client), current position (each competitor where available).

GSC export (if provided): Detect format. Extract per URL: page, clicks, impressions, CTR, average position.

Report data available:

Keyword export rows:        N
GSC pages:                  N
Competitor domains:         [list]
Analysis dimensions active: [Keyword gap | GSC opportunity | Topic cluster | AI gap]

Step 2 — Competitor keyword gap matrix

From the keyword export, identify:

Gap set A — Competitor ranks, client does not

  • Client position > 50 or not ranking.
  • At least one competitor ranks in positions 1–20.
  • Minimum monthly search volume: 100 (adjust down to 50 for B2B or niche markets where 100+ volume queries are rare).

Build a gap table:

| Keyword                 | Volume | Difficulty | Competitor 1 Pos | Competitor 2 Pos | Client Pos | Gap Type   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------|------------------|------------------|------------|------------|
| sitecore xm cloud setup |  1,200 |     42     |        3         |        7         |    n/r     | Missing    |
| headless cms comparison |  3,400 |     61     |        5         |       12         |     47     | Weak       |

Gap types:

  • Missing — client has no ranking page for this keyword.
  • Weak — client ranks 21–50; competitor is top 20.
  • Untapped — client ranks 11–20; quick-win optimisation opportunity.

Count gaps by type. Note: a site with > 500 gap keywords should be filtered to the highest-opportunity subset using the scoring in Step 4.

Step 3 — GSC opportunity analysis (if GSC data provided)

From the GSC export:

High impression / low CTR pages — these pages are ranking but not attracting clicks. Either:

  • Title/description is not compelling enough.
  • The page ranks for a query it doesn't fully satisfy (wrong intent match).
  • The page is below position 5 and needs ranking improvement.

Filter: impressions > 200/month AND CTR < 3% AND avg. position < 20.

For each qualifying page, produce:

| Page                    | Top Query (from GSC) | Impressions | CTR  | Avg. Pos | Likely Cause      | Recommendation          |
|-------------------------|----------------------|-------------|------|----------|-------------------|-------------------------|
| /services/web-design/   | web design agency    |    4,200    | 1.2% |    8.3   | Title mismatch    | Update title to include "agency" |

Position 4–10 pages — these are "almost ranking" pages where targeted optimisation (adding FAQ schema, adding statistics, improving TLDR structure) could push into top 3 and trigger AI Overview selection.

Step 4 — Topic cluster gap analysis

Identify topic clusters present on competitor sites but thin or absent on the client site.

A topic cluster consists of:

  • One pillar page — comprehensive coverage of the broad topic (e.g. "Headless CMS Guide").
  • Multiple cluster pages — deep dives into specific subtopics (e.g. "Headless CMS vs. Traditional CMS", "Headless CMS for Enterprise", "Headless CMS Performance").

Review competitor site navigation and content structure (from the keyword export's page data or from reference.md pattern heuristics). Identify clusters where:

  • Competitor has 3+ ranking pages on a topic theme.
  • Client has 0 or 1 page on the same theme.

Flag these as Topic cluster gaps — the highest-value gap type since comprehensive cluster coverage consistently outranks single-page coverage.

Step 5 — AI Overview gap analysis

For each gap keyword, assess AI Overview candidacy:

High AI Overview probability signals:

  • Informational query intent (what, how, why, guide, best, comparison).
  • Keywords with existing AI Overviews in search results (note if visible in keyword tool's SERP features column).
  • Topics where a well-structured, TLDR-first page with FAQPage schema would directly answer the query.

Low AI Overview probability:

  • Navigational queries (brand + site).
  • Pure transactional queries (buy X, pricing, free trial).
  • Highly contested YMYL (Your Money Your Life) topics where AI Overviews are more conservative.

Flag high-AI-probability gaps with a AI-OV tag.

Step 6 — Score and prioritise opportunities

For each gap keyword or topic cluster, compute an Opportunity Score:

Opportunity Score = (Volume × 0.30) + (Relevance × 0.35) + (Achievability × 0.20) + (AI OV Potential × 0.15)

Where each component is normalised to 0–10:

  • Volume score — 10 = volume > 5,000/mo; 5 = 500–1,000; 1 = < 100.
  • Relevance score — manually assigned (0–10) based on alignment with client's services/products/audience. Rate 8–10 for core service keywords, 4–7 for adjacent, 1–3 for peripheral.
  • Achievability score — 10 = difficulty < 30; 5 = difficulty 30–60; 1 = difficulty > 75.
  • AI Overview potential — 10 = informational + FAQ-structured query + existing AI Overview in SERP; 0 = pure transactional.

If --ai-focus flag is active, multiply AI OV Potential weight by 2 (renormalise total to 10).

Output sorted table:

| Rank | Keyword / Topic Cluster    | Vol  | Diff | Rel | Ach | AI | Score | Gap Type    | Content Type Recommended |
|------|----------------------------|------|------|-----|-----|----|-------|-------------|--------------------------|
|  1   | headless cms guide         | 4200 |  38  |  9  |  7  | 10 |  8.4  | Topic cluster | Pillar page (2500+ words) |
|  2   | sitecore xm cloud tutorial | 1200 |  42  |  9  |  6  |  9 |  7.8  | Missing       | How-to guide (1000 words) |

Step 7 — Content brief backlog

For the top 10–20 scored opportunities, produce a one-paragraph content brief outline for each:

## Brief #[N]: [Content Title]

**Target keyword:** [primary keyword]
**Secondary keywords:** [3–5 related terms]
**Content type:** [pillar | how-to | comparison | listicle | faq hub | news/update]
**Recommended word count:** [X]
**Target query intent:** [informational | transactional | navigational]
**AI Overview candidate:** [Yes / No / Likely]
**Platform adapter notes:** [Sitecore: ... | Optimizely: ... | Umbraco: ...]

**Angle:** [One sentence: what makes this page better than the #1 ranking competitor page?]
**Must cover:** [3–5 bullets: mandatory subtopics]
**FAQ pairs to include:** [3 question/answer stubs]
**Schema types to implement:** [Article + FAQPage, HowTo + BreadcrumbList, etc.]
**Internal linking targets:** [2–3 existing pages this should link to]

Output

Write:

  1. content-gap-analysis-<client-slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md — full report with all gap matrices, scores, and brief backlog.
  2. content-brief-backlog-<client-slug>.csv — spreadsheet-importable backlog with rank, keyword, score, content type, word count target.

Print a one-paragraph executive summary with total gap count, top 3 opportunities, and recommended sprint priority.

Technical details
Plugin
seo-geo-optimizer
Author
Dakota Smith
Skill name
seo-content-gap-analysis
Maturity
experimental
Security review
No security review
Owners
  • strategy
  • engineering
Argument hint
<your-domain> [--vs competitor1.com competitor2.com] [--keywords keywords-export.csv] [--gsc gsc-performance.csv]
Allowed tools
  • Read
  • Write
  • Edit
  • Grep
  • Glob
  • Bash(node *)
  • WebFetch(domain:ahrefs.com)
  • WebFetch(domain:semrush.com)
Source
plugins/seo-geo-optimizer/skills/seo-content-gap-analysis/SKILL.md

Edit this skill on GitHub — opens GitHub's web editor. No git knowledge needed.